Application Process

How to Answer “Why You?” in Law Firm Applications

How to identify what firms look for in trainees and turn your experience into credible evidence of fit.

EO Careers Team

If you want a broader understanding of how written applications and interviews fit together, you can explore our Application Process hub, which breaks down each stage of law firm recruitment in detail.

The question “Why you?” appears in many forms:

  • What skills or qualities would you bring to the role?

  • What makes you a strong candidate for this firm?

  • What attributes do you have that would make you a good trainee?

  • Describe the qualities of a successful commercial lawyer and how you demonstrate them

Although the wording changes, firms are asking the same underlying question:

Do you understand what we value in trainees and can you show, with evidence, that you meet that standard?

What firms are really assessing

“Why you?” is not about confidence or self-promotion.

Firms want to see whether you can:

  • identify the qualities they actually care about

  • select relevant experiences

  • explain how those experiences demonstrate the qualities in practice

Strong answers are not lists of achievements but arguments supported by evidence.

Step 1: Identify the firm’s trainee qualities

Before writing anything, you must identify what the firm values.

These are usually found in:

  • the trainee solicitor profile

  • graduate recruitment pages

  • firm values statements

  • assessment criteria for applications or interviews

Common qualities include:

  • commercial awareness

  • teamwork

  • communication

  • organisation

  • resilience

  • problem-solving

  • attention to detail

Do not try to cover everything. Most strong answers focus on two or three qualities explained well.

Step 2: Choose qualities you can genuinely evidence

The fastest way to weaken an answer is to claim qualities you cannot demonstrate.

Instead of asking "what sounds impressive", ask, "where have I actually shown this action?"

Evidence can come from:

  • academic work

  • part-time jobs

  • university projects

  • clinics or pro bono

  • entrepreneurial or initiative-led work

  • internships or placements

The experience matters less than how clearly you explain it.

Step 3: Show development, not just achievement

Firms are recruiting trainees, not finished lawyers.

That means they care about:

  • how you developed skills

  • how you handled responsibility

  • how you reflected on challenges

  • how you improved over time

An answer that shows growth is more persuasive than one that simply lists outcomes.

How to structure a strong “Why you?” answer

A clear structure might look like this:

  1. Identify the quality or skill

  2. Explain why it matters in a trainee solicitor

  3. Show how you developed it, using a specific example

  4. Briefly link it back to the firm or role

Repeat this for each quality you choose.

Example:

Communication is a core skill for trainee solicitors, particularly when working with clients across jurisdictions and practice areas. I developed this skill in practice during an internship where I acted as a point of contact between lawyers and clients from different jurisdictions, requiring me to explain legal concepts accurately and in plain language. This experience sharpened my ability to adapt my communication style to different audiences and levels of understanding. I strengthened this further through content-led work that involved translating complex business ideas into clear, engaging written material for a large readership. Together, these experiences reflect my ability to communicate with precision, clarity, and commercial awareness, qualities that are essential when advising clients in a commercial law firm.

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Listing achievements without explaining relevance

  • Repeating the CV in paragraph form

  • Claiming generic qualities with no evidence

  • Trying to cover too many skills at once

  • Writing confidently but vaguely

If a sentence could apply to any applicant, it is probably too weak.

Final thought

Strong “Why you?” answers are about showing judgment, self-awareness, and evidence-based reasoning. These are the same skills firms expect trainees to use with clients.

If you can identify what matters, explain how you meet that standard, and do so clearly, you are answering the question the way firms intend it to be answered.

You can find an example of how to answer "Why This Firm?" here.